<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles Clarke lectures on loyalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/charles-clarke-lectures-on-loyalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/charles-clarke-lectures-on-loyalty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/charles-clarke-lectures-on-loyalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=502#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>Thanks Rob - it&#039;s good to have another point of view. I&#039;m sure he is, as you say, clever and polite when required. It is an unfortunate trait of many in politics when they make presumptions of people&#039;s motives, or their views, because of their political labels (as I have done in the past - sorry Tom Watson).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Rob &#8211; it&#8217;s good to have another point of view. I&#8217;m sure he is, as you say, clever and polite when required. It is an unfortunate trait of many in politics when they make presumptions of people&#8217;s motives, or their views, because of their political labels (as I have done in the past &#8211; sorry Tom Watson).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Olivier</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/charles-clarke-lectures-on-loyalty/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=502#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>What I understood from meeting Charles Clarke as a constituent (not a Labour voter), is he doesn&#039;t fools gladly, is very bright, integral, good listener. He&#039;s always been very polite and good natured to me.

But folks with agenda&#039;s or malicous intent, or just not on top of their facts; he&#039;s a grizzly bear. Bears are hard to like; they do there own thing for their own honest reasons, few understand. IPPR or Brown; you are likely to evoke this side of him.

So Brown had it coming in the bear pit of Chaz Clarke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I understood from meeting Charles Clarke as a constituent (not a Labour voter), is he doesn&#8217;t fools gladly, is very bright, integral, good listener. He&#8217;s always been very polite and good natured to me.</p>
<p>But folks with agenda&#8217;s or malicous intent, or just not on top of their facts; he&#8217;s a grizzly bear. Bears are hard to like; they do there own thing for their own honest reasons, few understand. IPPR or Brown; you are likely to evoke this side of him.</p>
<p>So Brown had it coming in the bear pit of Chaz Clarke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

