Jan
12
Liverpool beating a strong Leicester City side 5-1 away from home in the FA Youth Cup was a fantastic result, and there were many good things to take away from the performance. But in time-honoured Liverpool tradition (albeit slightly tounge in cheek), I’d rather focus on the things that were not good enough.
For a team that won 5-1, Liverpool had a disappointing amount of possession. The first two goals came after Leicester had the reds on the back-foot and both were on the break. That shouldn’t detract from the quality of the moves, or the finishes but it was unbelievable that Liverpool were 2-0, and then 3-0 up.
When Liverpool did have the ball, they didn’t do much with it. They hurried their passing and struggled to string more than 3-4 passes together. As the game openened up, the reds were guilty of losing the ball in important areas of the pitch. A move like that resulted in the Leicester goal but it could have been so much more. They had two 1-on-1s with the goalkeeper and hit the woodwork three times.Even the excellent Andre Wisdom had a tendency to get rid rather than take time and pick a pass.
The passing was often over-ambitious all night and the objective appeared to be catching Leicester for pace rather than building sustained pressure. This meant that when Liverpool had broken up a Leicester attack, too often they found themselves on the back-foot soon after. It would have been better to see the players know when to make the ambitious pass and when to play it simple.
Leicester didn’t make it easy for Liverpool, often by-passing midfield completely. But the holding players didn’t stamp any authority on the game, disappointing for someone with the footballing abilities of Michael Roberts in particular.
Liverpool were also a bit rash in the tackle. Although the second of the two bookings was harsh, Roberts could have seen red at a higher level and Coady dived in too frequently for a player in that position.Coupled with this, the team was particularly effective at closing down Leicester. They didn’t hunt in pairs, as the first team does at its best and rarely hassled Leicester into a mistake in midfield. That left a lot of work for the defenders.
There were also individual things to work on:
- It was disappointing to see just how often Michael Ngoo was beaten in the air by the centrebacks
- Matty McGiveron was caught out a couple of times, though once rescued it with a brilliant saving tackle
- Deale Chamberlain was indecisive coming off his line and this led to a couple of great opportunities for Leicester
- Tom Ince often gave up when he lost the ball rather than track back
The point of all these negatives is not to be overly-critical (although I am a grumpy bugger). But when you bring in coaching staff from Barcelona, you aspire to a quality of football that was often missing tonight. Liverpool have assembled some great cup-tie winning teams at this level over the last few years, without developing players who can play consistently at the next level (Darby and Spearing not withstanding). If the new philosophy is to work, it needs to depend less on results and more about the style and ethos of the football.
But at least the team has more confidence and gets to play on in the competition. Next up, Watford or Hartlepool at Anfield.
Related posts:
- Liverpool v Leicester City FA Youth Cup Preview
- Liverpool v Wolves FA Youth Cup analysis
- Liverpool v Hull City post match analysis
- Liverpool reserves v Hull City post match analysis
- Liverpool v Manchester City reserves: post match analysis
At times it seemed that Ngoo had just one leg to many
a little bit harsh. when we did get the ball we played some great football – the trouble was leichester are a physical team who close down quick and attack quicker. none the less i can see where you are coming from. there are always bits to imporve and i feel these youngsters if they improve on these aspects can become quite something.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Coach, liverpool portal fan. liverpool portal fan said: Liverpool 5 – Leicester City 1 FA Youth Cup: not good enough … http://bit.ly/6X2odo [...]
I’m afraid I disagree with the analysis – it appears that the Liverpool youngsters are progressing exactly as the first team has in the last 5 years -outclassed by most opposition, yet winning by virtue of sheer luck and little style.
fox in the box: i take it you didnt watch the game. liverpool cut leicester at least 7 times. in one half. sheer luck? tell that to dalla valle. little style? did you see the goals?
dont knock the keeper when you aint sat and watched it the pitch was frose,wet icey,and snow on it at some parts of the game,theres being indecisive and not loseing your head in an important game,did you see the saves,50/50s punches,kicks that stoped leicester from scoreing,listen to the comentry on lfctv on the game on what they said on our keeper and then comment
That’s all true Marco. And I thought his distribution was good also. But the chance Yussuf had in the first half was due to Chamberlain being tentative when coming off his line – and in comparison to Bouzanis or Gulacsi, I thought he wasn’t as demonstrative in commanding his area. But I’m sure that will come over time