<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liverpool FC membership scheme fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GERE</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>GERE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=296#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>Really? I think taxing occasional match goers is a good way of ensuring that they contribute regularly to the club. But in return there does have to be a wider scheme which is more meaningful than a card which allows you to go to games.

Whilst we’re talking about taxes, perhaps there should actually be a tax on anyone who participates in a phone-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I think taxing occasional match goers is a good way of ensuring that they contribute regularly to the club. But in return there does have to be a wider scheme which is more meaningful than a card which allows you to go to games.</p>
<p>Whilst we’re talking about taxes, perhaps there should actually be a tax on anyone who participates in a phone-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Red membership scheme: LFC responds &#124; Matthew Cain's blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>All Red membership scheme: LFC responds &#124; Matthew Cain's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=296#comment-739</guid>
		<description>[...] @lfctv team put me in touch with the guys who are responsible for running and developing the All Red membership scheme which I criticised in an earlier blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] @lfctv team put me in touch with the guys who are responsible for running and developing the All Red membership scheme which I criticised in an earlier blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=296#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Really? I think taxing occasional match goers is a good way of ensuring that they contribute regularly to the club. But in return there does have to be a wider scheme which is more meaningful than a card which allows you to go to games. 

Whilst we&#039;re talking about taxes, perhaps there should actually be a tax on anyone who participates in a phone-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I think taxing occasional match goers is a good way of ensuring that they contribute regularly to the club. But in return there does have to be a wider scheme which is more meaningful than a card which allows you to go to games. </p>
<p>Whilst we&#8217;re talking about taxes, perhaps there should actually be a tax on anyone who participates in a phone-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=296#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Nicely done G Dubya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done G Dubya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW</title>
		<link>http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/liverpool-membership-scheme-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>GW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.matthewcain.co.uk/?p=296#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Good article, totally agree.

Here&#039;s a possible explanations for the scheme&#039;s failings:

http://studsup.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/overheard-telephone-conversation/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, totally agree.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a possible explanations for the scheme&#8217;s failings:</p>
<p><a href="http://studsup.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/overheard-telephone-conversation/" rel="nofollow">http://studsup.wordpress.com/2009/09/04/overheard-telephone-conversation/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

