Posts Tagged ‘analysis’

Liverpool 5 – Leicester City 1 FA Youth Cup: not good enough

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Liverpool beating a strong Leicester City side 5-1 away from home in the FA Youth Cup was a fantastic result, and there were many good things to take away from the performance. But in time-honoured Liverpool tradition (albeit slightly tounge in cheek), I’d rather focus on the things that were not good enough.

For a team that won 5-1, Liverpool had a disappointing amount of possession. The first two goals came after Leicester had the reds on the back-foot and both were on the break. That shouldn’t detract from the quality of the moves, or the finishes but it was unbelievable that Liverpool were 2-0, and then 3-0 up.

When Liverpool did have the ball, they didn’t do much with it. They hurried their passing and struggled to string more than 3-4 passes together. As the game openened up, the reds were guilty of losing the ball in important areas of the pitch. A move like that resulted in the Leicester goal but it could have been so much more. They had two 1-on-1s with the goalkeeper and hit the woodwork three times.Even the excellent Andre Wisdom had a tendency to get rid rather than take time and pick a pass.

The passing was often over-ambitious all night and the objective appeared to be catching Leicester for pace rather than building sustained pressure. This meant that when Liverpool had broken up a Leicester attack, too often they found themselves on the back-foot soon after. It would have been better to see the players know when to make the ambitious pass and when to play it simple.

Leicester didn’t make it easy for Liverpool, often by-passing midfield completely. But the holding players didn’t stamp any authority on the game, disappointing for someone with the footballing abilities of Michael Roberts in particular.

Liverpool were also a bit rash in the tackle. Although the second of the two bookings was harsh, Roberts could have seen red at a higher level and Coady dived in too frequently for a player in that position.Coupled with this, the team was particularly effective at closing down Leicester. They didn’t hunt in pairs, as the first team does at its best and rarely hassled Leicester into a mistake in midfield. That left a lot of work for the defenders.

There were also individual things to work on:

  • It was disappointing to see just how often Michael Ngoo was beaten in the air by the centrebacks
  • Matty McGiveron was caught out a couple of times, though once rescued it with a brilliant saving tackle
  • Deale Chamberlain was indecisive coming off his line and this led to a couple of great opportunities for Leicester
  • Tom Ince often gave up when he lost the ball rather than track back

The point of all these negatives is not to be overly-critical (although I am a grumpy bugger). But when you bring in coaching staff from Barcelona, you aspire to a quality of football that was often missing tonight. Liverpool have assembled some great cup-tie winning teams at this level over the last few years, without developing players who can play consistently at the next level (Darby and Spearing not withstanding). If the new philosophy is to work, it needs to depend less on results and more about the style and ethos of the football.

But at least the team has more confidence and gets to play on in the competition. Next up, Watford or Hartlepool at Anfield.

Henry Winter: Should Liverpool fans trust him?

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Henry Winter, Daily Telegraph football correspondent, has come in for a lot of criticism amongst Liverpool fans recently. Here’s just a flavour:

“Henry Winter is a poncey gobshite who watched football from the study window as a child rather than playing it.
“He is the Martin Tyler’s Monkey of Sports writers. He’s in with the old boys club and that includes Liverpool players. Nothing is every the fault of Gerrard or Carragher.

Juan Loco, Red and White Kop

“Henry Winter is a fairweather friend to us. It was cold and foggy tonight, therefore he’s being a c*nt again
macca888
, Red and White Kop

“Everyone from Collymore to Hansen to Merson to to Lawrenson to Bright to Cascarino to Henry Winter are spreading lies and making false accusations against our number one.”
Captain-Carra
on RAWK

So I’ve looked back at Henry Winter’s track record to try and assess whether he’s a journalist Liverpool fans can trust.

I’ve no doubt that Henry Winter respects Liverpool Football Club. He wrote last season:

walking up to Anfield is always one of the most emotive match-day experiences possible in English football.”

and

“If Robbie Keane and Andrea Dossena do not appear £27m well-spent, Benitez’s overall record is good. It is too premature to turn against him.”

He also has a track-record of association with the club. Henry Winter was the ghost writer of Kenny Dalglish’s autobiography and co-wrote Steven Gerrard’s excellent autobiography. It’s inconceivable that those two, in particular,  don’t trust him and whilst they may not have his number on speed dial, I’m sure that he gets more private insights into the club from them than many other journalists do.

Last season, he was occasionally critical of the club’s performances – although none more so than many fans. Whilst Winter didn’t cover himself in glory by declaring in February:

Another year wasted, another title campaign in ruins and another blow to Rafa Benitez’s reputation: Liverpool’s credibility this season now rests on progress in the Champions League – and that’s a fact.”

Henry Winter has a strong track-record of saying nice things about Liverpool’s star players: Steven Gerrard and Jamie Carragher.

“In an age of change, Gerrard’s devotion to one cause is remarkable.

Steven Gerrard has all the trappings of fame but he will never be trapped by them.

“Not many footballers have Cup finals named after them. Gerrard has two: the Champions League epic of 2005 and the FA Cup climax the following year.

And when Gerrard dived to win the last minute penalty against Athletico Madrid in the Champions League, Winter made no reference to Gerrard’s embarrassingly dramatic dive but focussed on the Madrid players ‘losing their discipline’.

It’s not that Henry Winter thinks Liverpool is a team man team. He praised Mascherano and Alonso for a couple of performances last season. He also wrote:

“The question has never been about whether Liverpool boasted the spine to win the title, certainly not with a backbone of Reina-Carragher-Gerrard and soon Mascherano and Torres. The problem has been the supporting cast. The arrival of Martin Skrtel, a mixture of the no nonsense and nimble, and, more recently, the indefatigable Robbie Keane and promising Albert Riera has given Anfield reason to hope.”

Unfortunately he also wrote: “Ryan Babel could emulate [Ronny] Rosenthal – if used through the middle. Liverpool have options.” But it would be wrong to hold that against him; many Liverpool fans have thought something similar from time to time.

However, Winter has never been particularly complementary about Benitez. Last season he produced a full-range of subtle criticisms of El Gafa:

“When Benitez eventually quits these shores, his leaving do will feature few members of the managerial community.

“Jose Mourinho is 1,000 miles awaybut remains at the forefront of Benitez’s thoughts.

“So no more rotation please and it is known that Liverpool’s players have held inquests into why they dropped points at home to lesser foe.

“Maybe all the “negative Liverpool’’ jibes made him loosen up, eschewing his usual caution” [After the Real Madrid second leg].

“When assessing whether Anfield’s love affair with Benitez has soured because of some crazy tactical decisions by the Spaniard in domestic combat, certain realities need remembering. There will always be Istanbul 05 when Liverpool played poorly (but won), always be the memory of his tactical destruction of Barcelona in Camp Nou, always be the reality that he also reached Athens 07 when Liverpool actually played well (but lost) . . . Any Kop dissent towards Benitez may come only if the coach fails in his usual European Cup trick of outwitting distinguished opposition. Real Madrid lie in wait and passage to the quarter-finals would reinvigorate Benitez’s standing.

“Keane’s treatment simply exposes the reality that Benitez is a cold manager, clearly an individual raised at icy Real Madrid rather than in Liverpool’s more compassionate, family-driven atmosphere. Gerrard’s famous lament about Benitez, that his career ambition remained a desire for a “well done off Rafa”, has never rung truer. Benitez’s approach to man-management has always been a hand at the throat not an arm around the shoulder. Cold, cold, cold. Benitez is a one-man cold snap.

Winter has occasionally resorted to statements that are just inaccurate:

“Then the murmurs of disapproval towards Benitez might become a chorus. Then the annoyance over why on earth he takes off Gerrard and Torres will spill forth . . . Benitez has erred with his substitutions, with not drilling the players enough in combating corners, corners and free-kicks and with that naïve outburst at Sir Alex Ferguson.

That, after we’d just beaten Real Madrid in the Bernabeau, Portsmouth away and were yet to lose to Middlesbrough.

That notwithstanding, there has been no inaccurate transfer speculation (although he urged the club sign Emile Heskey last winter), no inaccurate quotes about zonal marking, substitution by numbers, resting Torres or rotating more than other managers.

One of Winter’s most controversial articles this season was ‘Rafael Benítez will blame everyone but himself for Liverpool’s plight‘, which triggered my exchange with Gareth Roberts. In that article, he claimed that:

“some people tire of the self-absorbed Spaniard. We’ve heard all the excuses before. We’ve seen the utter reliance on Gerrard, Torres and, for all his recent woes, Carragher.”

And the passage that concerned me:

“Liverpool can afford to sack Benítez. Compensation would be less than £5 million under the “mitigating the loss” principle if he found employment, but no desire can be detected within the club for a regime change.

“The impressive managing director, Christian Purslow, is not the type for knee-jerk reactions. But it is known around Anfield that Purslow has talked to Benítez about his style of management, notably his cold detachment from the players.

“Sensible businesses plan for succession and any defenestration of Benítez should take place only in the close-season. Who knows? Benítez might win the FA Cup.

That particularly worried me – it sounded like a passage that could only have been written after a private chat with someone senior in the football club.

Henry Winter might not be your favourite journalist – and I haven’t written about the nice things he’s said about Everton and Manchester United. But he’s not antagonistic towards Liverpool Football Club – and apparently has good relationships with key figures inside the club. Although he is a Benitez-sceptic he stops short of the foolish uninformed criticisms that others make.

Verdict: Henry Winter is no Benitez fan but has good enough relationships with the club to respect what he has to say.

Journalists Liverpool fans can trust

Friday, November 27th, 2009

Which journalists Liverpool fans can trust is a key debate on message boards and blogs at the moment. I want to examine some of the key sports journalists to work out which are more trustworthy – or at least credible – on Liverpool FC than others.

There’s a view amongst Liverpool fans that you can’t trust any journalists. I’m not sure I can change anyone’s mind but in my research, I’d like to discover whether there are some journalists that can be trusted.

Others have a particular those that work for the Sun and some of those, by extension, with other News International titles. I have some sympathy with that – particularly when those fans are Liverpool born and bred. The Sun’s coverage of Hillsborough is at the root cause of this, but there’s also a perception that many journalists (think Boris Johnson) have consistently denigrated the city.

Some fans critise journalists that they don’t like (eg. participants on Jimmy Hill’s Sunday Supplement) - or those with which they disagree by attacking their motives (bitter blue, closet Manc). I hope to bust some of these myths but also highlight when particular journalists have a clear track record which makes their work biased or untrustworthy.

So how can you assess which journalists to trust? It’s not simple, but I’m going to use Journalisted - an index of every journalists’ output – and look at the articles that they’ve written over the last couple of seasons in order to find out:

  1. Are there themes that they write about consistently? eg. zonal marking, Rafa being defensive
  2. Do they repeat statements which aren’t borne out by the facts? eg. conceding from setpieces in 2006/07 and 2007/08 or Rafa rotates more than other managers
  3. Do they speculate about things that haven’t come to pass? eg. transfer speculation
  4. When they criticise, are such criticisms put in context? eg. Rafa’s net spend

This is the list of journalists I will analyse, so do suggest others I should look at:

  1. Henry Winter
  2. Patrick Barclay
  3. Richard Williams
  4. Chris Bascombe
  5. Steve Wilson
  6. Rory Smith
  7. James Ducker
  8. Oliver Kay
  9. Matt Dickinson
  10. Ian Ladyman