Posts Tagged ‘Liverpool’

Liverpool 5 – Leicester City 1 FA Youth Cup: not good enough

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010

Liverpool beating a strong Leicester City side 5-1 away from home in the FA Youth Cup was a fantastic result, and there were many good things to take away from the performance. But in time-honoured Liverpool tradition (albeit slightly tounge in cheek), I’d rather focus on the things that were not good enough.

For a team that won 5-1, Liverpool had a disappointing amount of possession. The first two goals came after Leicester had the reds on the back-foot and both were on the break. That shouldn’t detract from the quality of the moves, or the finishes but it was unbelievable that Liverpool were 2-0, and then 3-0 up.

When Liverpool did have the ball, they didn’t do much with it. They hurried their passing and struggled to string more than 3-4 passes together. As the game openened up, the reds were guilty of losing the ball in important areas of the pitch. A move like that resulted in the Leicester goal but it could have been so much more. They had two 1-on-1s with the goalkeeper and hit the woodwork three times.Even the excellent Andre Wisdom had a tendency to get rid rather than take time and pick a pass.

The passing was often over-ambitious all night and the objective appeared to be catching Leicester for pace rather than building sustained pressure. This meant that when Liverpool had broken up a Leicester attack, too often they found themselves on the back-foot soon after. It would have been better to see the players know when to make the ambitious pass and when to play it simple.

Leicester didn’t make it easy for Liverpool, often by-passing midfield completely. But the holding players didn’t stamp any authority on the game, disappointing for someone with the footballing abilities of Michael Roberts in particular.

Liverpool were also a bit rash in the tackle. Although the second of the two bookings was harsh, Roberts could have seen red at a higher level and Coady dived in too frequently for a player in that position.Coupled with this, the team was particularly effective at closing down Leicester. They didn’t hunt in pairs, as the first team does at its best and rarely hassled Leicester into a mistake in midfield. That left a lot of work for the defenders.

There were also individual things to work on:

  • It was disappointing to see just how often Michael Ngoo was beaten in the air by the centrebacks
  • Matty McGiveron was caught out a couple of times, though once rescued it with a brilliant saving tackle
  • Deale Chamberlain was indecisive coming off his line and this led to a couple of great opportunities for Leicester
  • Tom Ince often gave up when he lost the ball rather than track back

The point of all these negatives is not to be overly-critical (although I am a grumpy bugger). But when you bring in coaching staff from Barcelona, you aspire to a quality of football that was often missing tonight. Liverpool have assembled some great cup-tie winning teams at this level over the last few years, without developing players who can play consistently at the next level (Darby and Spearing not withstanding). If the new philosophy is to work, it needs to depend less on results and more about the style and ethos of the football.

But at least the team has more confidence and gets to play on in the competition. Next up, Watford or Hartlepool at Anfield.

Why Rafael Benitez should part own the club

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

I don’t think football clubs should be owned by rich individuals. Listing them on the stockmarket doesn’t work either. Some sort of Trust or co-operative model is much more appropriate because it can ensure the business is run for profit but that can be reinvested in the community which sustains the club, and without that profit coming at the expense of that community (grotesque ticket prices, for example).

However, fans owning football clubs is not enough. Any democratic ownership is not without its problems, as people invovled with supporters trusts will tell you. It appears that Notts County fans sold out their stake too cheaply and for a false promise of greater gratification than they could provide themselves.

Any successful organisation needs to be aligned to achieve the same objective. And in modern football that objective isn’t as simple as winning a competition. Competitions must be prioritised, budgets balanced, short term signings balanced against long term development. And style matters, too. Bolton fans never warmed to Gary Megson because they didn’t like the teams he put out. Chelsea fans didn’t care about Mourinho’s awful brand of football because they wanted results. They didn’t care about the long term financial security of the club, because they wanted trophies in the short term. Harry Redknapp got Portsmouth short term success but the club is on the verge of anhiliation. Shouldn’t his interests, and those of the club been better aligned?

The most successful clubs are those with a long term football leader (Wenger, Ferguson, Lacombe – even Dario Gradi in a different way). They have such an investment in the club that a financial stake isn’t so relevant. But a second tier manager isn’t going to be bothered about win bonusses. But shouldn’t Wenger be rewarded for keeping the club’s books balanced? Shouldn’t Rafa’s plans for improving the academy and reserve set-up come with an incentive?

Senior players could also have ’share options’. Steven Gerrard contributes significantly to the marketing of the club and will contribute a great deal as a former player one day. But he has no obvious incentive to sign autographs in town, give exclusive interviews to the in-house TV channel beyond the contractual requirements. Short term financial incentives won’t work – but literally owning a piece of the club would be very different.

If senior management of any business part owns it, it ensures the short term incentives are aligned with the long term stability of the project. That the harder they work in the short term, the better they will do in the longer term. That they will place structural health over a quick win. Surely football, as much as any other business, needs these traits?

LFC half season review 2009-10: Livin on a prayer

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

We’re half way to the end of the 2009/10 season and Liverpool are living on a prayer.

It’s been a deflating, disgusting, horrible, miserable, uninspiring, painful season so far. So much worse than anyone could have envisaged. When I read articles over the summer about Aquilani not being fit until Liverpool were out of the title race I scoffed ‘out of the title race by October? We won’t even had time for our traditional dodgy November’.

I wrote my hopes and fears for the start of the new season the evening before the season opener against Spurs. It’s well worth re-reading (even if I say so myself) because so much of it holds true:

“Rafa needs to win it to prove to his doubters that he is the right man to take the club forward. He needs it to instil further confidence in his project for root and branch reform of the club.

“Glen Johnson looks like a good signing but around him the defence is quite uncertain.

“If we don’t [win it] (presuming we make a good fist of it) I probably won’t be disappointed. But I will be nervous. Nervous that it will threaten the rebuilding of Liverpool. Nervous of the threat of a Man City or another newly-wealthy club usurping our place. Nervous of what the debt piled on Liverpool will mean for its future.

Those nerves remained throughout the games this year. All the way through the comfortable 4-0 win over Burnley I was anxious. I didn’t enjoy the game. Hull was better, and Man United provided a glimmer of hope. I could afford to be rueful after the beachball at the Sunderland game and was frustrated by the performance against Chelsea, as they looked vulnerable.

I spent the first few games of our decaying season thinking that, sooner or later, someone was going to get thumped. And then after the first half against Arsenal, thought that we were back on track. After Portsmouth, I thought we really were in trouble. Then I believed that we were highly unlikely to come third, despite the vulnerabilities of all of the top teams.

However, after an unconvincing win against Wolves our first 1-0 victory of the season has changed the complexion a little. I’m sure we will finish fourth. All we need to do is win four games that we lost in the first half of the season. Portsmouth, Fulham and Sunderland at home can deliver most of that whilst a win away at Birmingham would effectively seal it.

I’m still nervous about what this season will do to the underlying stability of the club, although Christian Purslow has impressed. Perhaps last season was a flash in the pan. Maybe the last minute goals and the extensive minutes playing against 10 men flattered to deceive. But I do think that the prospects of the first team are only a fraction of what’s at stake for the club.

The hardest task next summer might be holding on to what we have whilst a long world cup run for Spain or England would present additional challenges. A trophy would provide some much needed gloss on the season but after what we’ve had to put up with thus far, I’d settle for confirming 4th place in early April.